Mentoring Process in Midwifery: Peer Midwife Resource


Abstract views: 0 / PDF downloads: 0

Authors

  • Asibe ÖZKAN
  • Fatma Gamze MALÇOK Başakşehir Pine and Sakura City Hospital

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.13623418

Keywords:

Midwife, Mentoring, Mentee, Peer, Clinical Orientation

Abstract

Objective: The aim of this study was to examine the mentoring process in midwives and to determine the effects of peer mentoring on the acclimatization process, job comprehension and job readiness.  

Method: The sample of the descriptive study conducted in 2022 consisted of 64 newly recruited mentees, 33 mentor midwives who mentored them, and 72 senior midwives working in clinics where mentee midwives worked to determine the effect of peer mentoring on clinic adaptation and patient care. The research data were collected by personal information form, opinions about mentoring form and peer mentoring evaluation scale in midwifery.  

Results: Mentees; 76.6% of the mentees found the mentoring process necessary and its duration sufficient, 67.2% defined peer mentoring as a helpful peer, and the same percentage stated that they felt more competent while caring for the patient after the mentoring process.  The mean total score obtained from the peer mentoring evaluation scale was 55.05±17.21, and the highest mean scores obtained from the subheadings of the scale belonged to the subheadings of contribution to the mentee 22.32±7.14, mentor characteristics 17.01±5.11, and peer relations 16.17±4.27, respectively.

Conclusion: Peer mentoring was considered to be an important human resource that is overlooked for the guidance process and it was concluded that the use of this resource will make great contributions to professional development.

Author Biographies

Asibe ÖZKAN

 

 

Fatma Gamze MALÇOK , Başakşehir Pine and Sakura City Hospital

 

 

References

Ajorpaz, M.N., Tafreshi, Z.M., Mohtashami, J., Zayeri, F., Rahemi, Z. (2016). The effect of mentoring on clinical perioperative competence in operating room nursing students. J Clin Nurs, 25(9-10): 1319-25. doi: 10.1111/jocn.13205.

Alamgir, H., Drebit, S., Li, H.G., Kidd, C., Tam, H., Fast, C. (2011). Peer coaching and mentoring: A new model of educational intervention for safe patient handling in health care. Am J Ind Med, 54(8): 609-17. doi: 10.1002/ajim.20968.

Bradford, H., Hines, H., Labko, Y., Peasley, A., Valentin-Welch M, Breedlove, G. (2022). Midwives Mentoring Midwives: A Review of the Evidence and Best Practice Recommendations. Journal of Midwifery & Women's Health, 67(1): 21–30. https://doi.org/10.1111/jmwh.13285

Burgess, A., Van Diggele, C., Mellis, C. (2018). Mentoring in the health professions: a review. Clin Teach, 15(3):197-202. doi: 10.1111/tct.12756. Epub 2018 Jan 10.

Choi, A.M.K., Moon, J.E., Steinecke, A., Prescott, J,E. (2019).Developing a Culture of Mentorship to Strengthen Academic Medical Centers. Academic medicine: Journal of the Association of American Medical Colleges, 94(5): 630–633. DOI: 10.1097/ACM.0000000000002498

Crisp, G., Cruz, I. (2009). Mentoring college students: A critical review of the literature between 1990 and 2007. Research in Higher Education, 50(6):525-545. Doi: 10.1007/s11162-009-9130-2.

Douglass, A., Smith, D., Smith, L.(2013). An exploration of the characteristics of eff ective undergraduate peer-mentoring relationships. Mentoring & Tutoring: Partnership in Learning, 21(2):219-234. Doi:10.1080/13611267.2013.813740.

Ergün, Y., Şahin Orak, N., Islattı Mutlu, Ç., Kolaç, N. (2021, Eylül). Hemşirelik Bölümü Öğrencilerinin Akran Yönderliği Programına İlişkin Deneyim ve Görüşleri: Bir Devlet Üniversitesi Örneği. Sözel Bildiri, Hemşirelik Eğitiminin Geleceği Sempozyumu 3: Pandemi Sürecinde Eğitimi İyileştirme Yaklaşımları, Online.

Hallam, E., Choucri, L. (2019). A literature review exploring student midwives' experiences of continuity of mentoring in the maternity ward. Br J Midwifery, 27( 2 ): 115-119. https://doi.org/10.12968/bjom.2019.27.2.115

Hogan, R., Fox, D., Barratt-See, G. (2017). Peer to peer mentoring: Outcomes of third-year midwifery students mentoring first-year students. Women Birth, 30(3): 206-213.doi: 10.1016/j.wombi.2017.03.004.

Kılınç, U., Alparslan, A.M. (2014) Yükseköğretimde Mentörlük: Mentör ve Menti Bakış Açılarını Belirlemeye Yönelik Bir Uygulama. Yükseköğretim Dergisi, 4(2):91-101.

Kocadere, S.A. (2015). The Development of a Scale on Assessing Peer Mentoring at the College Level. Mentoring&Tutoring: Partnership in Learning, 23(4): 328-340. https://doi.org/10.1080/13611267.2015.1090283.

Kocadere, S.A. (2020). Eğitim Bilimleri Alanında Elektronik Mentorluk. İçinde. Öngöz, S. (Ed), Eğitim Bilimleri Alanında Elektronik Mentorluk (pp. 175-188). Ankara, Pegem Akademi, (I.Baskı).

Maynard, L. (2012). Using clinical peer coaching for patient safety. AORN J, 96 (2):203-205. doi: 10.1016/j.aorn.2012.05.002.

Pehlivan Coştu, E., Bilgiç, Ş. (2021). The Effectiveness of Peer Coaching in the Skill Development of Nursing Students: The Experimental Study. Türkiye Klinikleri Hemşirelik Bilimleri Dergisi,15(3):689-97. Doi: 10.5336/nurses.2023-95277

Schwellnus, H., Carnahan, H. (2014). Peer-coaching with health care professionals: What is the current status of the literature and what are the key components necessary in peer-coaching? A scoping review. Medical Teacher, 36(1):38-46. doi: 10.3109/0142159X.2013.836269.

Unfpa.org. (2021). The State of World’s Midwifery. Erişim tarihi: 21. 11. 2023, https://www.unfpa.org

Ünver, V., Akbayrak, N. (2013). Hemşirelik Eğitiminde Akran Eğitim Modeli. Dokuz Eylül Universitesi Hemşirelik Yüksekokulu Dergisi, 6(4):214–217.

Published

2024-09-01

How to Cite

ÖZKAN , A., & MALÇOK , F. G. (2024). Mentoring Process in Midwifery: Peer Midwife Resource. GEVHER NESIBE JOURNAL OF MEDICAL AND HEALTH SCIENCES, 9(3), 345–356. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.13623418

Issue

Section

Articles