Comparison of Gem Premier 5000 Device and Radiometer ABL 800 Flex Blood Gas Analyzers


Abstract views: 416 / PDF downloads: 138

Authors

  • Muzaffer KATAR Tokat Gaziosmanpasa University Medical School, Department of Medical Biochemistry
  • Osman DEMİR

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.8402027

Keywords:

Gem Premier 5000, ABL 800 Flex, Analytical performance, Blood gases, pH

Abstract

Objective: In this study, we aimed to compare the analytical performance of the Gem Premier 5000 (Instrumentation Laboratory, Bedford, MA, USA) blood gas analyzer with the ABL 800 Flex (Radiometer, Copenhagen, Denmark) blood gas analyzer used in our laboratory.

Methods: 96 consecutive samples sent to Tokat Gaziosmanpaşa University Hospital Central Laboratory between 1-20 May 2023 were included in the study. Samples are taken into a 2 mL blood gas injector containing 70 IU of lithium heparin (Ayset Medical Products (Seyhan, Adana, Turkey) and analyzed with two devices consequetively. The parameters of pH, pCO2, pO2, ctHb, HCT, sO2, O2Hb, COHb, HHb, MetHb, Na, K+, Cl, Ca2+, Glucose, Lactate and HCO3 were evaluated. The significance test of the difference between the two spouses, Pearson correlation and Bland-Altman analysis were used. SPSS 19 (IBM SPSS Statistics 19, SPSS inc., An IBM Co., Somers, NY) was used.

Results:  In comparison of the two groups, clinically negligible, statistically significant difference was found between all parameters except pH, pO2, HCT, MetHb, Na, Cl and HCO3 (p<0.001). Pearson correlation coefficients (CCC) of the parameters were in the range of 0.721-0.999. Bland-Altman values for pH, pCO2, MetHb and lactate were Bias :0.013, SD :0.031721, IIa :-0.04951, uIa :0.07484, Bias -3.44286, SD : 3.378443, IIa:-10.0646, UIa : 3.178891, Bias : -0.1, SD : 0.676123, IIa: -1.4252, uIa : 1.225202, Bias : 0.269231, SD : 0.217503, IIa:-0.15708, ula: 0.695537 respectively.

Conclusion: The GEM PREMIER 5000 was correlated with the Radiometer ABL800 Flex in terms of results and was acceptable in clinical practice. GEM PREMIER 5000 has been deemed suitable for use at the bedside due to its advantages like ease of use and short maintenance time.

References

Bardell, D., West, E., & Senior, J. M. (2017). Evaluation of a new handheld point-of-care blood gas analyser using 100 equine blood samples. Veterinary anaesthesia and analgesia, 44(1), 77-85.

Börekçi, S., & Umut, S. (2011). Arter Kan Gazi Analizi, Alma Teknigi ve Yorumlamasi. Turk Toraks Dergisi, 12, 5.

Kennedy, J. W. (1995). Method comparison and bias estimation using patient samples; Approved guideline. Publ EP9-A, Wayne, PA.

Kennedy, S. A., Constable, P. D., Sen, I., & Couëtil, L. (2012). Effects of syringe type and storage conditions on results of equine blood gas and acid-base analysis. American journal of veterinary research, 73(7), 979-987.

Kirsch, K., Detilleux, J., Serteyn, D., & Sandersen, C. (2019). Comparison of two portable clinical analyzers to one stationary analyzer for the determination of blood gas partial pressures and blood electrolyte concentrations in horses. PLoS One, 14(2), e0211104.

Picandet, V., Jeanneret, S., & Lavoie, J. P. (2007). Effects of syringe type and storage temperature on results of blood gas analysis in arterial blood of horses. Journal of veterinary internal medicine, 21(3), 476-481.

Sandersen, C., Dmitrovic, P., Dupont, J., Cesarini, C., Guyot, H., Serteyn, D., & Kirsch, K. (2023). Analytical Performance Evaluation of the New GEM® Premier™ 5000 in Comparison to the Epoc® Blood Gas Analyzer in Horses. Veterinary Sciences, 10(2), 114.

Published

2023-10-04

How to Cite

KATAR, M., & DEMİR, O. (2023). Comparison of Gem Premier 5000 Device and Radiometer ABL 800 Flex Blood Gas Analyzers. GEVHER NESIBE JOURNAL OF MEDICAL AND HEALTH SCIENCES, 8(Özel Sayı), 639–648. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.8402027

Issue

Section

Articles