Effects of Exposure to Surgical Smoke on Symptoms in Operating Room Staff: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
Abstract views: 321
/ 
PDF downloads: 142
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.7926831Keywords:
Electrosurgical Smoke, Occupational Exposure, Occupational Hazard, Precaution, Surgical SmokeAbstract
Objective: Thanks to the rapid development of technology, the number of advanced equipment used in operating rooms is increasing, as in many areas. Although such equipment provides convenience, it also poses some risks for operating room staff and patients. The visible gas released into the environment because of the use of equipment such as electrocautery, laser, ultrasonic scalpel, drill, and saw for the purposes of hemostasis, dissection or excision during surgery is called surgical smoke, which might affect operating room staff negatively.
Material and Method: This systematic review and meta-analysis aims to determine the effect of smoke prevention measures on symptoms in operating room workers exposed to surgical smoke. Descriptive, cross-sectional and prospective cohort studies published between 2010-2021 were evaluated. Eligible studies were selected from the databases of CINAHL, MEDLINE, SCOPUS, Science Direct, Cochrane Library, and Google Scholar on December 21, 2021. Results of 8 studies (6 descriptive, 1 cross-sectional, 1 prospective cohort) were pooled.
Results: The analysis of pooled studies revealed that having knowledge of surgical smoke, presence of an evacuator, frequency of exposure, and the symptoms of headache, nausea, sore throat and burning eyes had a high positive effect on exposure to surgical smoke. Taking precautions against surgical smoke and the symptom of respiratory changes were found to have a negative effect on exposure to surgical smoke.
Conclusion: It was concluded that the incidence of symptoms of headache, nausea, sore throat and burning eyes increased in direct proportion to exposure to surgical smoke, and there was a decrease in respiratory changes because of the exposure. In addition, the exposure decreased as the knowledge level of the operating room workers increased, they took more precautions and they used smoke evacuation devices more, and the incidence of symptoms increased as the frequency of exposure to surgical smoke increased.
References
Alcan, AO, Van Giersbergen, MY, Tanıl, V, Dinçarslan, G, Hepçivici, Z, Kurcan, Ç, Dere, T. (2017). Examination of surgical smoke risks and protective measures in a university hospital. Journal of Ege University Faculty of Nursing, 33(2), 27-35.
Alver, E, Demirci, A, Özcimder, M. (2012). Polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons and their effects on health. Mehmet Akif Ersoy University Journal of Science Institute 3(1), 45-52.
Asdornwised, U, Pipatkulchai, D, Damnin, S, Chinswangwatanakul, V, Boonsripitayanon, M, Tonklai, S. (2018). Recommended practices for the management of surgical smoke and bio-aerosols for perioperative nurses in Thailand. Journal of Perioperative Nursing, 31(1), 33-41.
Aydın, N, Kaya, U, Dal Yılmaz, Ü. (2021). The Effect of Surgical Smoke on Operating Room Staff. Medical Journal of Western Black Sea, 5(1), 80-85.
Ball, K. (2010). Surgical smoke evacuation guidelines: compliance among perioperative nurses. AORN journal, 92(2), e1-e23.
Benson, SM, Maskrey, JR, Nembhard, MD, Unice, KM, Shirley, MA, Panko, JM. (2019). Evaluation of personal exposure to surgical smoke generated from electrocautery instruments: a pilot study. Annals of Work Exposures and Health, 63(9), 990-1003.
Beswick, A, Evans, G. (2012). Evidence for exposure and harmful effects of diathermy plumes (surgical smoke). Buxton: Health & Safety Executive.
Bree, K, Barnhill, S, Rundell, W. (2017). The dangers of electrosurgical smoke to operating room personnel: a review. Workplace health & safety, 65(11), 517-526.
Canicoba, ARB, de Brito Poveda, V. (2021). Surgical Smoke and Biological Symptoms in Healthcare Professionals and Patients: A Systematic Review. Journal of PeriAnesthesia Nursing, 37(1), 130-136.
Claudio, CV, Ribeiro, RP, Martins, JT, Marziale, MHP, Solci, MC, Dalmas, JC. (2017). Polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons produced by electrocautery smoke and the use of personal protective equipment 1. Revista latino-americana de enfermagem, 25.
Comprehensive meta-analysis (n.d.). Retrieved April 4, 2022, from https://www.meta analysis.com/pages/demo.php
Critical appraisal tools. JBI. (n.d.). Retrieved October 23, 2022, from https://jbi.global/critical-appraisal-tools
DerSimonian, R, Laird, N. (1986). Meta-analysis in clinical trials. Controlled clinical trials, 7(3), 177-188.
Dinçer S. (2014). Applied Meta-Analysis in Educational Sciences. (1st ed.). Ankara: Pegem Academy Publishing.
Edwards, BE, Reiman, RE. (2008). Results of a survey on current surgical smoke control practices. AORN journal, 87(4), 739-749.
Fox-Lewis, A, Allum, C, Vokes, D, Roberts, S. (2020). Human papillomavirus and surgical smoke: a systematic review. Occupational and Environmental Medicine, 77(12), 809-817.
Georgesen, C, Lipner, SR. (2018). Surgical smoke: risk assessment and mitigation strategies. Journal of the American Academy of Dermatology, 79(4), 746-755.
Hahn, KY, Kang, DW, Azman, ZAM, Kim, SY, Kim, SH. (2017). Removal of hazardous surgical smoke using a built-in-filter trocar: a study in laparoscopic rectal resection. Surgical Laparoscopy Endoscopy & Percutaneous Techniques, 27(5), 341-345.
Ilce, A, Yuzden, GE, Van Giersbergen, MY. (2017). The examination of problems experienced by nurses and doctors associated with exposure to surgical smoke and the necessary precautions. Journal of Clinical Nursing, 26(11-12), 1555-1561.
Keeley, L, Smalley, P. (2022). Occupational hazards of surgical smoke plume in the operating theatre. Surgical Plume Alliance 4-5.
Kılıç, S. (2015). Kappa test. Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, 5(3), 142.
Lindsey, C, Hutchinson, M, Mellor, G. (2015). The nature and hazards of diathermy plumes: a review. AORN journal, 101(4), 428-442.
Liu, N, Filipp, N, Wood, KB. (2020). The utility of local smoke evacuation in reducing surgical smoke exposure in spine surgery: a prospective self-controlled study. The Spine Journal, 20(2), 166-173.
Mowbray, N, Ansell, J, Warren, N, Wall, P, Torkington, J. (2013). Is surgical smoke harmful to theater staff? A systematic review. Surgical endoscopy, 27(9), 3100-3107.
Navarro-Meza, MC, González-Baltazar, R, Aldrete-Rodríguez, MG, Carmona-Navarro, DE, López- Cardona, MG. (2013). Síntomas respiratorios causados por el uso del electrocauterio en médicos en formación quirúrgica de un hospital de México. Revista Peruana de Medicina Experimental y Salud Pública, 30(1), 41-44.
Oberg, T, Brosseau, LM. (2008). Surgical mask filter and fit performance. American journal of infection control, 36(4), 276-282.
Olgun, Ş. (2020). Surgıcal smoke, precautıons and employee awareness. Journal of Awareness, 5(1), 65.
OSHA (The Occupational Safety and Health Administration). Laser/Electrosurgery Plume (n.d.). Retrieved October 21, 2022, from https://www.osha.gov/laser-electrosurgery-plume/standards
Pillinger, SH, Delbridge, L, Lewis, DR. (2003). Randomized clinical trial of suction versus standard clearance of the diathermy plume. Journal of British Surgery, 90(9), 1068-1071.
Saito, AC, Margatho, AS, Bieniek, AA, Stanganelli, NC, Ribeiro, RP. (2019). Signs and symptoms related to inhalation of surgical smoke in the nursing team. Escola Anna Nery, 23.
Smith, JD, MacDougall, CC, Johnstone, J, Copes, RA, Schwartz, B, Garber, GE. (2016). Effectiveness of N95 respirators versus surgical masks in protecting health care workers from acute respiratory infection: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Cmaj, 188(8), 567-574.
Spearman, J, Tsavellas, G, Nichols, P. (2007). Current attitudes and practices towards diathermy smoke. The Annals of the Royal College of Surgeons of England, 89(2), 162-165.
Stanganelli, NC, Bieniek, AA, Margatho, AS, Galdino, MJQ, Barbosa, KH, Ribeiro, RP. (2019). Inhalation of surgical smoke: cohort of signs and symptoms in residents. Acta Paulista de Enfermagem, 32, 382-389.
Stanley, K. (2019). Diathermy smoke shown to be hazardous, so why are we not protecting ourselves? Journal of perioperative practice, 29(10), 321-327.
Tseng, HS, Liu, SP, Uang, SN, Yang, LR, Lee, SC, Liu, YJ, Chen, DR. (2014). Cancer risk of incremental exposure to polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons in electrocautery smoke for mastectomy personnel. World Journal of Surgical Oncology, 12(1), 1-8.
Usta, E, Aygin, D, Bozdemir, H, Uçar, N. (2019). The effects of surgical smoke in operating rooms and precautions for protection Journal of Health Science and Profession, 6(1), 17-24.
Ünver, S, Topçu, SY, Fındık, ÜY. (2016). Surgical smoke, me and my circle. International Journal of Caring Sciences, 9(2), 697-703.
Van Gestel, EA, Linssen, ES, Creta, M, Poels, K, Godderis, L, Weyler, JJ, ... Vanoirbeek, JA. (2020). Assessment of the absorbed dose after exposure to surgical smoke in an operating room. Toxicology Letters, 328, 45-51.
Van Giersbergen, MY, Alcan, AO, Kaymakci, S, Ozsaker, E, Dirimese, E. (2019). Investigation of surgical smoke symptoms and preventive measures in Turkish operating rooms. International Journal of Health Sciences and Research, 9(1), 138-144.
Van Giersbergen, M, Şahin Köze, B. (2022). Surgical Smoke. In Van Giersbergen, MY, Kaymakçı, Ş. (Eds.). Operating Room Nursing (pp. 295-308). İzmir: Turkish Society of Surgical and Operating Room Nurses.
Xie, W, Dumas, O, Varraso, R, Boggs, KM, Camargo, CA, Stokes, AC. (2021). Association of Occupational Exposure to Inhaled Agents in Operating Rooms with Incidence of Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease among US Female Nurses. JAMA network open, 4(9), e2125749-e2125749.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2023 GEVHER NESIBE JOURNAL OF MEDICAL AND HEALTH SCIENCES
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
The journal is licensed under a 