Foreign Body Ingestion Presentations in Children


Abstract views: 158 / PDF downloads: 85

Authors

  • Didem GÜLCÜ TAŞKIN Sağlık Bilimleri Üniversitesi, Adana Şehir Eğitim ve Araştırma Hastanesi
  • Zerrin ÖZÇELİK Sağlık Bilimleri Üniversitesi, Adana Şehir Eğitim ve Araştırma Hastanesi
  • İlknur BANLI CESUR Sağlık Bilimleri Üniversitesi, Adana Şehir Eğitim ve Araştırma Hastanesi
  • Cankat ERDOĞAN Sağlık Bilimleri Üniversitesi, Adana Şehir Eğitim ve Araştırma Hastanesi

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.7388922

Keywords:

foreign body ingestion, presentation in children, complications

Abstract

Aim: Foreign body ingestion is one of the most common reasons for admission to pediatric emergency departments. It is one of the important admission complaints that should be questioned in the history and kept in mind regarding the need for urgent intervention in pediatric emergency service admissions and, in some cases, the difficulties in diagnosis. We wanted to examine the presentation patterns and complications of our patients who presented with foreign body ingestion, to examine an issue that is important for the emergency services, and to emphasize the necessity of questioning foreign body ingestion if the cause of the complaint cannot be found in some disease groups.

Material and Method: Our study was carried out by retrospective examination of the files of the patients evaluated in a Pediatric Gastroenterology and Pediatric Surgery Outpatient Clinic, and recording the complaints, presence of complications, foreign body localization and what the removed bodies were.

Results: Twenty-five patients with suspected foreign body ingestion and detected foreign body were included in the study. 40% of the patients were girls, 60% were boys, and the mean age was 4.5 years. The most common presentation was 44% asymptomatic. At the time of admission, 16% of the patients were complicated by perforation. Foreign bodies were removed endoscopically in 44% and surgically in 20%. The most extracted object was coin (20%). The most common location was the gastric antrum in 52%.

Conclusion: Foreign bodies requiring intervention are most frequently removed endoscopically, and the rate of patients requiring surgical intervention is low. It should not be forgotten that a significant part of the patients are asymptomatic, and in some patient groups, especially in patients with autism and in very young age groups, foreign body ingestion should be asked, even if there are no symptoms.

References

Arshad M., Jeelani S.M., Salim A., Hussain, B.D.(2019). Multiple Magnet Ingestion leading to Bowel Perforation: A Relatively Sinister Foreign Body. Cureus, 11, e5866.

Birk, M., Bauerfeind, P., Deprez, P.H., Häfner, M., Hartmann, D., Hassan, C., …Meining, A. (2016). Removal of foreign bodies in the upper gastrointestinal tract in adults: European Society of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy (ESGE) clinical guideline. Endoscopy, 48,489–496.

Ho J.P.K., Jameson C. (2019). Small bowel perforation from foreign body ingestion. ANZ J Surg, 89, 1336-1337.

Kodituwakku R., Palmer S., Paul, S.P. (2017). Management of foreign body ingestions in children: button batteries and magnets. Br J Nurs, 26, 456-461.

Krom H., Visser, M., Hulst, J.M., Wolters, V.M., Van den Neucker, A.M., de Meij, T., … Kindermann, A. (2018). Serious complications after button battery ingestion in children. European Journal of Pediatrics, 177, 1063–1070.

Lee B.K., Ryu, H.H., Moon J.M., Jeung K.W. (2010). Bowel perforations induced by multiple magnet ingestionemm. Emergency Medicine Australasia, 22, 189–191.

Li, C., Yong C.C., Encarnacion, D.D. (2019). Duodenal perforation nine months after accidental foreign body ingestion, a case report. BMC Surgery, 19, 132.

Mark Guelfguat, M., Kaplinskiy, V., Reddy, S.H., Poce, J.D. (2014). Clinical Guidelines for Imaging and Reporting Ingested Foreign Bodies. AJR Am J Roentgenol, 203, 37-53.

Mowry J.B., Spyker D.A., Cantilena L.R., McMillan N., Ford M. (2013). Annual Report of the American Association of Poison Control Centers’ National Poison Data System (NPDS):31st Annual Report. Clin Toxicol (Phila), 52, 1032-1283.

Salman H, Gürsoy Koca T, Dereci S, Akçam M. (2022). Foreign Body Ingestion and Management in Children. Pediatr Emerg Care, 38, 617-620.

Schwartz G.F., Polsky H.S. (1976). Ingested foreign bodies of the gastrointestinal tract. Am Surg, 42, 236–238.

Sung SH, Jeon SW, Son HS, Kim, S.K., Jung, M.K., Cho, C.,M…Kweon, Y.O. (2011). Factors predictive of risk for complications in patients with oesophageal foreign bodies. Dig Liver Dis, 43, 632-635.

Wang, X., Su, S., Chen, Y., Wang, Z., Li, Y., Hou, J…. Wang, B. (2021). The removal of foreign body ingestion in the upper gastrointestinal tract: a retrospective study of 1,182 adult cases. Ann Transl Med, 9, 502.

Yildiz H, Okay ST, Yildirim E, Beskardesler N. (2021). A pin detected by ultrasonography within the normal appendix: prior to surgery, an impressive use of ultrasonography to localize an ingested foreign body exactly. J Ultrasound, 24, 525-528.

Yilmaz S, Aydin H, Bolukbasi H. (2022). Insidious Onset of Localised Small Intestinal Perforation by Ingested Plastic Fork. J Coll Physicians Surg Pak, 32, 1070-1072.

Downloads

Published

2022-12-05

How to Cite

GÜLCÜ TAŞKIN, D., ÖZÇELİK, Z., BANLI CESUR, İlknur, & ERDOĞAN, C. (2022). Foreign Body Ingestion Presentations in Children. GEVHER NESIBE JOURNAL OF MEDICAL AND HEALTH SCIENCES, 7(21), 66–70. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.7388922

Issue

Section

Articles